Questions about patch antennas.

To discuss all things relating to flying models via remote video

Questions about patch antennas.

Postby rogueqd » Mon Jan 23, 2012 10:41 am

Quick question about the patch antennas, do they allow any omnidirectional flying at all? As in do you have 50 or 100m around you to land and stuff? How far behind the antenna can you fly before you lose signal?

I guess this comes from IBCrazy's Antennas101 video. He had blue shapes radiating out from his antennas and said that as long as the shapes touch you've got signal. I used to think of it more like light with a patch antenna being like a torch and the plane being like a light sensitive diode or something. The diode is only going to react if the torch like falls on it. Can the omni antenna on the plane kind of reach out and pick up a bit of signal from the patch even if the patch is pointed away from it?
rogueqd
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:52 am
Location: Northern beaches, Sydney, Australia

Re: Questions about patch antennas.

Postby Shotglass » Mon Jan 23, 2012 8:55 pm

any anytenna no matter hot directional will radiate backwards to some degree
with a single patch antenna realistically youre looking at something in the range of -20dbi to -30dbi of gain behind it or about 100 to 1000 times less power radiated in that direction compared to some theoreitcal antenna that radiates in all directions identically (and about 1000 to 10000 time less power radiated in that direction than to the front)

anway off the top of my head iirc the range factor is the square root of the power factor
no assuming the 2.4km the frsky system allegendly can achieve with its usual monopole antenna (for simplicity and as a safety factor well assume that thing has a gain of 3dbi or factor 2) we get that the power radiating to the back of the patch antenna is 2000 times less than that of the normal frsky antennas
take the squareroot of that invert it ans multiply it with 2.4km and unless i made a mistake somewhere i get ~50m of range

i wouldnt really trust a large expensive plane with that calculation though
either way point is its not like your plane will immediately crash the moment you fly behind the patch antenna
it will however severely limit your range
Shotglass
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 5:52 pm

Re: Questions about patch antennas.

Postby kaptain_zero » Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:59 am

Here's a typical patch antenna pattern: http://goo.gl/k3ZiA
"I'd like to live as a poor man with lots of money."
-- Pablo Picasso
User avatar
kaptain_zero
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:50 am
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Re: Questions about patch antennas.

Postby zann68 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:38 am

I've noticed on these directional antenna's they refer to some as "Patch" and some "Panel" are these the same antenna or is there a real difference? Ohh and lets not forget some say Vertical , Horizontal or even Vertical & Horizontal polarization. dBi looks to be just as bad on choices as well, however it seems around 10 to 12dBi may be a winner, don't really know either. From what I gather dBi determines how tight the pattern is that the antenna will see "How much directional it really is". I have the Eagle Tree system and 5.8ghz CP antenna's. I ask this because I want to add a directional antenna to my setup for my tracker. I also have a Pan/Tilt kit coming. I have been looking over and over at antennas what a dizzying mess.
Calm down!! Gravity has been checked, and it's still working
User avatar
zann68
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:29 pm
Location: New Brockton, Alabama

Re: Questions about patch antennas.

Postby RCModelReviews » Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:20 am

If you're running CP antennas then you don't want a patch, you want a helical.

The helical will maintain the benefits you've already experienced from your CP antennas but can also give you lots of gain.

A 5-turn helical will probably give you about 9dB of gain and an operating angle of around 60 degrees. They're also pretty easy to make.
RCModelReviews.com, just the facts.
User avatar
RCModelReviews
 
Posts: 2120
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 3:40 am

Re: Questions about patch antennas.

Postby zann68 » Sat Apr 21, 2012 2:22 am

RCModelReviews wrote:If you're running CP antennas then you don't want a patch, you want a helical.

The helical will maintain the benefits you've already experienced from your CP antennas but can also give you lots of gain.

A 5-turn helical will probably give you about 9dB of gain and an operating angle of around 60 degrees. They're also pretty easy to make.


Can you point me to a recommended guide for making a helical 5.8ghz.
Calm down!! Gravity has been checked, and it's still working
User avatar
zann68
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:29 pm
Location: New Brockton, Alabama

Re: Questions about patch antennas.

Postby francoishaha » Wed May 30, 2012 1:17 pm

Check on rcgroups ibcrazy helical antenna thread
User avatar
francoishaha
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:02 pm
Location: Quebec Canada

Re: Questions about patch antennas.

Postby pldb64 » Thu May 31, 2012 12:32 am

Do you have a specific link in mind? ... my search of RCG didn't find a 5.8GHz related thread? ... but very interested :-)
Turnigy 9x, FrSky 2-Way/Telemetry DHT DIY, Smartieparts BRD, ER9x FW
AXN-Floater (stock esc, motor & prop, HK orange 9g servos)
pldb64
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:09 am
Location: Sydney, australia

Re: Questions about patch antennas.

Postby francoishaha » Thu May 31, 2012 12:54 am

Yes, sorry i was with my phone and it's so long seeking a link, so here it is for the helical antenna tutorial by IBCrazy
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1377791
User avatar
francoishaha
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:02 pm
Location: Quebec Canada


Return to FPV

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron