Jim Drew of XPS

Chew the fat on any non-RC subject. It's a free-for-all but common rules of decency do apply so act like adults and don't embarrass yourself by trolling or cuss'n.

Re: Jim Drew of XPS

Postby RCModelReviews » Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:02 pm

A dynajet won't get you 100 miles -- at those sizes, pulsejets just don't have the necessary efficiency (TSFC) to deliver that kind of range -- the fuel payload would be too great. At 100mph it would take 60 minutes to travel 100 miles and that would involve carrying about 12lbs of fuel -- plus airframe, plus engine, plus control system (so we're talking at least 16-18lbs). No model of that weight will hit 100mph in level flight with just 4.5lbs of thrust -- in fact it'll have a hard time flying at all straight out of the launch.

Quite a few people have been flying XPS without issues -- but in those early days of magical antennas, no frequency agility etc -- lots of other people lost models to it, that is without question.

JD may have some clever people working for him -- and that's got to be a very good thing -- since he has demonstrated on numerous occasions that he has little clue when it comes to even the most basics of electronic/electrical theory. His public display of ignorance of Ohms Law was perhaps the most outstanding example of this.

Still -- XPS seems to work okay now so it's all good.
RCModelReviews.com, just the facts.
User avatar
RCModelReviews
 
Posts: 2120
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 3:40 am

Re: Jim Drew of XPS

Postby Engineer » Thu Feb 24, 2011 4:15 am

You are underestimating the engineering expertise of the Boeing C. It was a Dynajet but it was highly modified. I don't remember the details because it was 40 years ago.
I do remember that we exceeded 100 MPH by a wide margin.
Engineer
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 4:04 am

Previous

Return to Non-RC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest